Barriers and fences…

Here we go again…

“The Treasury wants to continue to target welfare spending…. but there is no appetite any more to take the tough, robust measures that would genuinely bring the national budget back towards balance”. [Peter Oborn. Daily Telegraph. 26 June 2013]

Sometimes I’m not sure how far we’ve come as a society since the Poor Laws of the 19th Century …and the assertion that conditions within workhouses should be made worse than the worst conditions outside of the workhouse so that they served as a deterrent, whilst relief should only be available in the workhouse.

The deserving versus undeserving divide and rule tactic misses a number of key points:

  • There remains an endemic problem with low-paid and low-skilled work in the UK, which traps some people in a low-pay no-pay cycle. Consequently the UK has a real and growing problem of in-work poverty, which now outstrips workless poverty – 6.1m people experiencing poverty live in a household where at least one person works.
  • Meanwhile the UK’s failure to build enough homes pushes up housing costs, with a knock-on effect for the benefits bill. But this isn’t the only factor pushing up the cost of living. The rising cost of childcare, public transport, energy and fuel have all made it harder for families to make ends meet.
  • And that’s before even looking at the growing proportion of the welfare bill taken up by pensions as our society ages and people live longer…..
Outside, looking in... John Callaway 2013

Outside, looking in… John Callaway 2013

2 responses to “Barriers and fences…

  • garethhhgeorge

    low pay no pay clicks with the low cost no cost ethos of the vso education programme!

  • johnnyc1959

    Not sure what your trying to say here Gareth.

    I’m suggesting that the benefits system which currently exists in the UK is creating a ‘divide & rule society’, where those on the wrong side find themselves marginalised…I’m not clear how this links with VSO

    If you’re referring to VSO volunteers, then they make an active choice to undertake a role with a daily living allowance, which may be less than they would otherwise receive in their home country.

    If you’re suggesting that a volunteer programme creates an ‘opportunity’ for local NGO’s to utilise skills for low/no cost then that may on occasion be a justified claim, but arguably needs to be looked at on a case by case basis…

    Don’t have enough experience of the VSO education programme, but your comments wouldn’t immediately ring a bell with my own experiences of the HIV and livelihoods programmes….

    By the way…how’s Nepal these days?


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

%d bloggers like this: